Vote for Parliament: New JWS Research poll finds Yes vote on the wane

Just one in 10 Australians believe a Voice for Parliament is necessary in the face of rising living costs and inflation, new information reveals.

New figures from JWS Research have confirmed that three-quarters of Australians would prefer the federal government to focus its efforts on reducing the cost of the ongoing disaster.

The survey revealed that after the price of a place of residence, 58% of households rated hospitals, welfare care and aging as the second most necessary, while housing and interest rates were mentioned by 53% of respondents.

Local points, along with The Voice, ranked fifteenth out of the 22 points respondents were asked about, meaning only one in ten Aussies thought it was necessary.

New data from JWS Research has revealed that three-quarters of Australians would prefer the Albanian authorities to tackle living costs rather than a vote in parliament.

Albania’s institutions were given an efficiency index of just 29 for how they handled prices of the ongoing natural disaster, and 30 for how they handled housing and interest rates.

Voters were similarly asked if they plan to vote yes or no in the upcoming referendum on The Voice, scheduled for October.

Of the 1,225 respondents, 46% said they would vote safe, 43% said they would vote no, and 11% said they were undecided.

The latest poll confirmed the vote was in favour, having fallen from 51% to 46% in the last JWS poll in February.

This means that the no vote not only attracts people who previously thought they would vote safely, but also people who previously had doubts.

The revealed information confirmed that men were more opposed to the vote than ladies, with 50% of men intending to vote against compared to 37% of ladies.

Only eight percent were unclear, compared to 14 percent of women.

One of the key states to see the biggest vote change since February was NSW.

Earlier in the 12 months, 52% of voters said they would vote safe in the upcoming referendum, however this number fell to 41%, but no – rising from 32% to 47%.

In Queensland, the No vote rose from 38 per cent in February to 46 per cent, while the safe vote fell from 48 per cent to 45 per cent.

The only place where the safe voter saw a jump in attendance was Western Australia, where 61% of people would vote safely.

The Yes marketing campaign, led by Mr Albanese, says the vote will help unite Australia by giving Indigenous Australians a say in insurance policies that affect their communities.

The “No” marketing campaign, led by Jacinta Nampiyinpa Price, says the Voice’s true capabilities have not been made clear and will only represent a “symbolic” change.

The referendum bill was finally backed by Opposition Leader Peter Dutton last week, regardless of whether the politician opposes the vote itself.


In October, Australians can be asked to:

Proposed Act: Amend the Constitution to recognize Australia’s First Nations, creating an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander voice. Do you agree with these proposed changes?

If Australians vote Yes, the following changes to the structure could be made:

May have a physique known as an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander voice.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples’ voices would be able to speak to the Commonwealth Parliament and the Executive on matters affecting Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.

Parliament, which is the subject of this constitution, has the power to legislate on matters relating to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander voice and its composition, features, powers and procedures.

Mr Albanese responded to claims of a cut in aid to The Voice throughout Monday’s Today programme.

The Prime Minister was asked if he was involved in the latest election results.

“We will be there to present the case,” he said.

The case for recognizing Indigenous Australians in our constitution. A reason for them to speak out – an advisory body to provide advice on issues affecting Indigenous Australians.

‘It makes sense. You will get higher results for those who pay attention to the people directly affected by the coverage. We will make this thing very stable.

Mr Albanese said he was “very confident” the referendum would go ahead.

“I have faith in the Australian people that they will look at the wording that’s there and say, ‘Yes, it’s time to recognize the First Australians in our country’s constitution,'” he said.

The bill governing the referendum passed the Senate on Thursday by a vote of 52 to 19.

The bill was eventually supported by opposition leader Peter Dutton, regardless of whether the politician opposes the Voice itself.

What we all know so far about Voice for Parliament:

Here, Daily Mail Australia looks at some of the key issues in the Voice so far and how the federal government has dealt with them:

What advice can The Voice give to Parliament and the Federal Government?

The Voice provides advice on matters directly related to indigenous peoples.

It will respond to requests from the authorities, though with the added option of proactively addressing issues they believe may affect them.

The group can have personal resources to analyze and work with local communities to make sure it best reflects their wishes.

How are the Voice members chosen?

Voice members are appointed by Indigenous communities and can serve on the committee for a term to be decided.

The method by which communities elect their representatives is agreed by local communities with the federal government as part of a “post-referendum process” to ensure cultural legitimacy.

Who can be part of the commission?

Voice actors must be Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander.

They are elected from each state and territory and have a balanced representation of women and men nationally.

The authorities have additionally assured that younger individuals may be included in the committee to provide illustration throughout the group.

Will the vote be clear?

Authorities say The Voice may be subject to audit and reporting purposes to ensure it is held accountable and stays in the clear.

Members of the Voice can be subject to the requirements of the National Anti-Corruption Commission and, if found guilty, can be fined or removed from the committee.

Will the Voice have veto power?


Does The Voice operate independently of the various institutional companies?

The committee should respect the work and functions of existing organisations, the federal government says.

Will voice handle cash?

The Voice will not process cash or provide service providers to the group.

Its sole function may be to improve the packages and providers of current institutions and to advise on new concepts that will emerge as a result of developments.

Related Articles

Back to top button