Obama-appointed judge lays into WI law firm after election lawsuit: ‘It makes no sense’

A federal judge ripped into a high Democratic law firm that was trying to problem an absentee poll witness requirement in Wisconsin.

“Normally, the court would begin by searching for other textual clues in the statute. But in this case, the most obvious problem with plaintiffs’ interpretation is that it simply does not make any sense,” U.S. District Judge James Peterson mentioned in a ruling towards the Elias Law Group, the firm based by Democratic tremendous lawyer and former Clinton marketing campaign basic counsel Marc Elias, which was trying to problem the Wisconsin law.

At the guts of the problem is Wisconsin’s state statute below § 6.87(2), which lays out absentee voting necessities within the state.

The Wisconsin law requires voters to each certify that they meet the necessities to vote and that they’ve adopted the proper course of for filling out an absentee poll, which features a part that requires “witness certification.”

Elias mentioned the witness requirement violates the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and Civil Rights Act of 1964, arguing {that a} witness can be compelled to confirm the eligibility of the voter filling out the poll.

U.S. District Judge James Peterson
U.S. District Judge James Peterson shot down the lawsuit instantly with out a lot additional investigation. Getty Images

“Under plaintiffs’ interpretation, every witness would have to determine the voter’s age, residence, citizenship, criminal history, whether the voter is unable or unwilling to vote in person, whether the voter has voted at another location or is planning to do so, whether the voter is capable of understanding the objective of the voting process, whether the voter is under a guardianship, and, if so, whether a court has determined that the voter is competent,” Peterson, an Obama appointee, wrote.

“Many witnesses would be unable to independently verify much of the required information,” Peterson continued. “The statute allows any adult U.S. citizen to serve as a witness, suggesting that a wide variety of people should be able to do the job… It makes no sense to interpret § 6.87 in a way that would make compliance virtually impossible.”

Absentee ballots
Wisconsin absentee ballots have a witness requirement. AP
Marc Elias
The law firm claims that the witness requirement for absentee ballots violates the Voting Rights Act and Civil Rights Act. The Washington Post by way of Getty Im

The resolution follows the highest firm’s failure in one other Wisconsin case, which noticed Elias try and power the state to redraw its congressional maps. But the Wisconsin Supreme Court opted to not hear the case, a victory for Republicans within the state.

Jonathan Turley, Fox News Media contributor and the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University, famous that Elias himself has been on the heart of a number of controversies and courtroom losses in current reminiscence.

“Elias has been sanctioned in past litigation. Yet, other Democrats have continued to hire Elias despite his checkered past,” Turley wrote Saturday. “Elias unsuccessfully led efforts to challenge Democratic losses. Elias also was the subject of intense criticism after a tweet that some have called inherently racist.”

The Elias Law Group didn’t instantly reply to a Fox News Digital request for remark.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button