North Texas jury is deliberating on death or life in prison for killer who shot woman, cop

Prosecutors requested 12 Johnson County residents to vote Thursday morning to place 31-year-old Jerry Elders to death. The protection mentioned he deserves life in prison with out parole.

Jurors started deliberating towards a punishment verdict round 10 a.m. Thursday.

Elders was found guilty of capital murder final week. He shot a Burleson police officer throughout a site visitors cease then fled, kidnapped 60-year-old Robin Waddell in her truck, shot her and threw her out of her truck in the again lot of the Joshua Police Department, authorities have mentioned. Waddell died from her wounds. The officer, Joshua Lott, was shot three times but survived.

Defense attorneys mentioned in closing arguments Thursday morning that Elders was underneath the affect of medication when he dedicated the crimes, was put on the streets by his household as a teen and was seen by the Johnson County District Attorney’s Office as not being a risk to society as a result of they let him out on probation.

The argument from prosecutors in the penalty part of the trial that Elders is a hazard to society, even when sentenced to life in prison, falls flat on its face, protection legal professional Miles Brissette advised the jurors.

In a courtroom crammed with legislation enforcement, on the primary day of the three-week trial when the gallery was standing room solely, the protection began the day asking Visiting Judge Lee Gabriel to expel uniformed legislation enforcement from the courtroom. The concern was that the jury could be intimidated by the uniforms or really feel a way of neighborhood expectation to ship a death penalty verdict.

Gabriel denied the request, saying that if most people is allowed in the courtroom that uniformed officers are as nicely.

State’s legal professional Matthew Staton argued in closing statements that not solely would Elders proceed to be a risk to the society in prison, but in addition he deserves the death penalty.

“Nobody is giving this man the death penalty,” Staton mentioned. “You will answer two questions but nobody in this courtroom is giving him the death penalty. He earned that.”

Jurors requested to resolve who Jerry Elders actually is

Staton mentioned that witnesses the protection introduced in the punishment part of the trial didn’t know the true Elders. Family members talked about him being fun-loving, humorous and good with kids, however Staton mentioned they didn’t know he was stealing catalytic converters, doing medicine and plotting to homicide a police officer.

“Who would want Jerry to babysit your kids?” Staton requested.

The prosecution referred to as Elders a coward and mentioned that “what’s buried deep in his soul … is hatred for the law and for law enforcement.”

The protection mentioned Elders is a person who has been rejected by his household and put on the streets at 13 or 14 years previous. Brissette mentioned he’s been in and out of jail since he was a child, lacked help and confronted jealousy from his sister, whose kids he mentioned preferred Elders greater than her.

The prosecution mentioned Elders had help from his household. Staton mentioned they gave him meals to eat, cash when he wanted it and a spot to remain when he wasn’t incarcerated.

Both agreed that it is as much as the jury to take a look at the proof and resolve which model of Elders is true.

This is a creating story. For the most recent updates, sign up for breaking news alerts.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button