Judge tosses suit accusing MSG, James Dolan of using facial ID for profit

A federal choose this week tossed a data-privacy lawsuit accusing Madison Square Garden of illegally using facial recognition expertise to scare off the sector’s authorized opponents.

“As objectionable as the defendant’s use of biometric data may be, it does not . . . violate” privateness legal guidelines, Manhattan federal Judge Lewis Kaplan wrote in a five-page ruling.

Kaplan rejected a January advice by U.S. Magistrate Judge James Cott that the class-action lawsuit accusing MSG Entertainment and proprietor James Dolan of illegally using biometric information for private achieve ought to proceed.

James Dolan, sitting courtside at the garden in a white button down shirt and black pants, with his arms folded
MSG proprietor James Dolan was capable of get a choose to dismiss a lawsuit accusing it of violating the town’s biometrics regulation. Getty Images

Instead, Kaplan in Tuesday’s choice mentioned he disagreed with claims that MSG “profited” by collected facial pictures partly to scare off future lawsuits.

Dolan has come below fireplace for his controversial use of creepy facial-recognition software program to bar unwelcome attorneys and different critics from getting into the World’s Most Famous Arena — residence of the Rangers and Knicks — and sister venues like Radio City Music Hall.

An MSG spokesperson hailed the choose’s choice, saying, “As we’ve always said, our policies and practices are 100% legal, and we’ve always made clear we don’t sell or profit from customer data.”

fans line up at security checkpoints to get inside Madison Square Garden.
Madison Square Garden makes use of facial recognition software program. Matthew McDermott

The suit filed on behalf of two New Yorkers, Aaron Gross and Jacob Blumenkrantz, doubtlessly would have coated the thousands and thousands of individuals who’ve attended occasions at MSG-owned venues for the reason that metropolis’s biometric information safety regulation went into impact in July 2021.

The law is used to stop leisure venues and different companies from promoting private data for profit.

When The Post first reported on the suit after it was filed in state court docket in March 2023, MSG execs referred to as it “the dumbest suit yet.” 

Israel David, the plaintiffs’ lawyer, didn’t return messages.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button